Evan
05bdf02169
* feat(workflows): add 13 workflow templates across engineering, business, and productivity Engineering: - bug-triage: reproduce path → root cause → fix plan - api-design: resource model → endpoints → OpenAPI spec - incident-postmortem: timeline → RCA → full postmortem report - test-generation: code analysis → edge cases → full test suite - refactor-plan: smell analysis → prioritised opportunities → migration plan Business: - competitor-analysis: profiles → SWOT → strategy report - product-spec: problem definition → user stories → full PRD - market-research: landscape → segments → research report Productivity/Thinking: - meeting-summary: raw notes → structured summary → follow-up email - decision-matrix: criteria → weighted scoring → recommendation memo - learning-plan: gap analysis → roadmap → week-1 day-by-day plan - job-application: job analysis → tailored resume → cover letter → interview prep - blog-post: research → outline → draft → SEO optimisation Closes #1912 on librefang/librefang * fix(workflows): overhaul existing 9 templates - data-pipeline: redesigned — original 'extract from URL' step was broken (LLMs cannot fetch URLs); replaced with paste-data approach (profile → clean_transform → analyse) with analysis_goal parameter - translate-polish: added target_language and register parameters; added back-translation step for accuracy verification - weekly-report: added team/audience parameters, richer extraction step, added Metrics and Notes sections - content-pipeline: added audience/tone parameters, added outline step between research and writing - content-review: fix category 'content' → 'creation' - customer-support: fix category 'support' → 'business' * style(workflows): convert all prompt_template strings to TOML multiline syntax Replace \n escape sequences with real newlines using triple-quote multiline strings ("""...""") across all 22 workflow templates. No content changes — formatting only. * style(hands): replace \n escape in reddit writer format example with multiline code block
77 lines
2.0 KiB
TOML
77 lines
2.0 KiB
TOML
id = "decision-matrix"
|
|
name = "Decision Matrix"
|
|
description = "Evaluate competing options against weighted criteria to produce a clear, defensible recommendation."
|
|
category = "thinking"
|
|
tags = ["decision", "analysis", "strategy", "thinking"]
|
|
|
|
[i18n.zh]
|
|
name = "决策矩阵"
|
|
description = "对竞争方案按加权标准进行评估，输出清晰、有据可查的推荐结论。"
|
|
|
|
[[parameters]]
|
|
name = "decision"
|
|
description = "The decision to be made and its context"
|
|
param_type = "string"
|
|
required = true
|
|
|
|
[[parameters]]
|
|
name = "options"
|
|
description = "The options or alternatives being considered"
|
|
param_type = "string"
|
|
required = true
|
|
|
|
[[steps]]
|
|
name = "criteria"
|
|
prompt_template = """
|
|
You are a decision analyst. For the decision below, define the evaluation criteria:
|
|
1. List 5-8 criteria that matter most for this decision
|
|
2. For each criterion: define what 'good' looks like (high score) and 'bad' looks like (low score)
|
|
3. Assign weights (must sum to 100%) based on business importance
|
|
4. Note which criteria are must-haves (disqualifiers if failed)
|
|
|
|
Decision: {{decision}}
|
|
Options: {{options}}
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
[[steps]]
|
|
name = "scoring"
|
|
prompt_template = """
|
|
Score each option against each criterion on a 1-10 scale. Justify every score with one sentence of evidence or reasoning. Then calculate weighted scores.
|
|
|
|
Format as a table: Option | Criterion | Raw Score | Weight | Weighted Score.
|
|
|
|
Add a totals row per option.
|
|
|
|
Decision: {{decision}}
|
|
Options: {{options}}
|
|
|
|
Criteria and weights:
|
|
{{criteria}}
|
|
"""
|
|
depends_on = ["criteria"]
|
|
|
|
[[steps]]
|
|
name = "recommendation"
|
|
prompt_template = """
|
|
Synthesise the analysis into a decision memo:
|
|
|
|
## Recommendation
|
|
Clear winner with one-sentence rationale.
|
|
|
|
## Why Not the Others
|
|
For each non-recommended option: the decisive weakness.
|
|
|
|
## Key Risks of the Recommended Option
|
|
Top 3 risks and mitigations.
|
|
|
|
## Conditions That Would Change This Recommendation
|
|
What new information would flip the decision.
|
|
|
|
## Next Steps
|
|
3 immediate actions to execute the decision.
|
|
|
|
Scoring:
|
|
{{scoring}}
|
|
"""
|
|
depends_on = ["scoring"]
|