librefang-registry/hands/wiki/SKILL-analyst.md

name, version, description, author, tags, runtime

name	version	description	author	tags	runtime
wiki-analyst	1.0.0	Wiki Analyst skills — synthesis methodology, gap identification, contradiction handling, and query resolution.	Leszek3737	wiki knowledge-base analyst synthesis reasoning	prompt_only

Wiki Hand — SKILL-analyst.md

1. Obsidian Conventions

Wikilinks

• Internal cross-references: [[page-name]] (no path, no extension)
• Display text override: [[page-name|Display Text]]
• Never use markdown [text](path) for internal links
• External URLs: standard markdown [text](https://...)
• Image embeds: ![[filename.png]]
• Images live in raw/assets/

File Naming

• Format: kebab-case.md
• Max 40 characters (excluding .md)
• ASCII only — transliterate non-ASCII characters (ü → ue, ñ → n, ś → s, etc.)
• Entities: canonical name (john-doe.md, not dr-john-doe-phd.md)
• Concepts: noun phrase (knowledge-base.md, not about-knowledge-bases.md)
• Sources: derived from title (the-future-of-ai.md)
• Syntheses: derived from query (tradeoffs-x-vs-y.md)
• No version suffixes (_v2, _revised, _updated)

Frontmatter

• Valid YAML between --- delimiters at the top of every page
• All fields lowercase with underscores
• Dates: ISO 8601 (YYYY-MM-DD)
• Lists: YAML sequences (not comma-separated strings)
• Dataview-compatible: all fields are queryable

Dataview Compatibility

Useful queries the user can run in Obsidian:

TABLE confidence, source_count, last_updated
FROM "pages/entities"
SORT source_count DESC

LIST
FROM "pages/concepts"
WHERE confidence = "disputed"

TABLE claim_count, date_ingested
FROM "pages/sources"
SORT date_ingested DESC

---

4. Provenance and Confidence

Inline Provenance Syntax

Every key claim (bullet point in Key Claims, Key Points, Key Facts sections) requires a provenance tag at the end of the line:

- The company reported $10M ARR in Q4 2025 ([[annual-report-2025]], extracted)
- This suggests a 40% year-over-year growth rate (inferred)
- However, a later filing revised this to $8.5M ([[sec-filing-q1-2026]], extracted)
- The actual growth rate remains disputed ([[annual-report-2025]], [[sec-filing-q1-2026]], disputed)

Tag	Meaning	When to use
([[source]], extracted)	Directly stated in the source	Verbatim facts, statistics, dates, names
([[source-a]], [[source-b]], extracted)	Corroborated across sources	Same fact confirmed independently
(inferred)	Derived by the LLM	Connections, implications, patterns not explicitly stated
([[source-a]], [[source-b]], disputed)	Sources contradict	Present both claims, let the user judge

Page-Level Confidence

Set in frontmatter confidence field:

Level	Rule
high	All key claims are extracted from 2+ corroborating sources
medium	Mix of extracted and inferred, OR all extracted from a single source
low	Primarily inferred, OR based on one unverified source
disputed	Contains at least one claim tagged disputed

Propagation in syntheses: A synthesis page's confidence = the MINIMUM confidence of its consulted pages. If any consulted page is disputed, the synthesis must flag this.

Confidence Update Triggers

• New source corroborates an existing claim → consider upgrading to high
• New source contradicts an existing claim → downgrade to disputed
• Source retracted or superseded → re-assess claims dependent on it

---

7. Synthesis Methodology

Combining Multiple Sources

1. Identify overlapping claims — same fact from different sources
2. Note corroboration — claims supported by 2+ sources get higher confidence
3. Surface contradictions — present both sides with citations, do not silently pick one
4. Fill complementary gaps — where sources complement each other, weave together
5. Maintain provenance chain — every claim in the synthesis traces back to source pages

Handling Contradictions

## 2. Page Templates

## 12. Worked Examples