librefang-registry/workflows/research.toml

id = "research"
name = "Research & Summarise"
description = "Research pipeline that investigates a topic from multiple angles, cross-checks findings for accuracy, and produces a concise executive summary with citations."
category = "research"
tags = ["research", "fact-check", "summarise", "analysis"]

[i18n.zh]
name = "调研与摘要"
description = "调研流水线，从多个角度研究主题，交叉验证结果的准确性，并生成带引用的精炼摘要。"

[[parameters]]
name = "topic"
description = "The research topic or question to investigate"
param_type = "string"
required = true

[[parameters]]
name = "depth"
description = "Research depth: overview, standard, or deep-dive"
param_type = "string"
required = false
default = "standard"

[[parameters]]
name = "audience"
description = "Target audience for the summary (executive, technical, general)"
param_type = "string"
required = false
default = "general"

[[steps]]
name = "research_primary"
prompt_template = """
Conduct {{depth}}-level research on the following topic. Identify key facts, major viewpoints, recent developments, and relevant data points. Organise findings into clear sections with source attribution where possible.

Topic: {{topic}}
"""

[[steps]]
name = "research_counter"
prompt_template = """
Investigate counter-arguments, alternative perspectives, and potential criticisms related to the following topic. Identify areas of genuine controversy or debate, and note any commonly cited claims that are misleading or outdated.

Topic: {{topic}}
"""

[[steps]]
name = "fact_check"
prompt_template = """
Cross-check the following research findings for factual accuracy. For each major claim, assess confidence level (confirmed, likely, uncertain, disputed). Flag any contradictions between the primary research and counter-arguments. Note any claims that require additional verification.

Primary research:
{{research_primary}}

Counter-arguments:
{{research_counter}}
"""
depends_on = ["research_primary", "research_counter"]

[[steps]]
name = "summarise"
prompt_template = """
Produce a concise executive summary suitable for a {{audience}} audience. Incorporate verified findings from the fact-check step. Structure as:
1. Key takeaways (3-5 bullet points)
2. Detailed analysis with confidence levels
3. Areas of uncertainty or debate
4. Recommendations for further investigation

Fact-checked research:
{{fact_check}}

Primary findings:
{{research_primary}}

Alternative perspectives:
{{research_counter}}
"""
depends_on = ["fact_check"]

[i18n.zh-TW]
name = "研究與摘要"
description = "從多個角度調研主題、交叉驗證結果準確性，並產生含引用的精煉摘要。"

[i18n.ja]
name = "リサーチと要約"
description = "多角的にトピックを調査し、結果を相互検証、引用付きの要約を生成するリサーチパイプライン。"

[i18n.ko]
name = "리서치 및 요약"
description = "다양한 각도로 주제를 조사하고, 결과를 교차 검증한 뒤, 인용이 포함된 간결한 요약을 생성."

[i18n.de]
name = "Recherche & Zusammenfassung"
description = "Recherche-Pipeline: untersucht ein Thema aus mehreren Blickwinkeln, gleicht Ergebnisse ab und liefert eine prägnante Zusammenfassung mit Quellen."

[i18n.es]
name = "Investigación y resumen"
description = "Pipeline de investigación: analiza un tema desde múltiples ángulos, contrasta hallazgos y produce un resumen conciso con citas."

[i18n.fr]
name = "Recherche et synthèse"
description = "Pipeline de recherche : étudie un sujet sous plusieurs angles, recoupe les informations et produit une synthèse concise avec citations."