feat(workflows): expand template library from 9 to 22 + multiline string cleanup (#36)

* feat(workflows): add 13 workflow templates across engineering, business, and productivity

Engineering:
- bug-triage: reproduce path → root cause → fix plan
- api-design: resource model → endpoints → OpenAPI spec
- incident-postmortem: timeline → RCA → full postmortem report
- test-generation: code analysis → edge cases → full test suite
- refactor-plan: smell analysis → prioritised opportunities → migration plan

Business:
- competitor-analysis: profiles → SWOT → strategy report
- product-spec: problem definition → user stories → full PRD
- market-research: landscape → segments → research report

Productivity/Thinking:
- meeting-summary: raw notes → structured summary → follow-up email
- decision-matrix: criteria → weighted scoring → recommendation memo
- learning-plan: gap analysis → roadmap → week-1 day-by-day plan
- job-application: job analysis → tailored resume → cover letter → interview prep
- blog-post: research → outline → draft → SEO optimisation

Closes #1912 on librefang/librefang

* fix(workflows): overhaul existing 9 templates

- data-pipeline: redesigned — original 'extract from URL' step was
  broken (LLMs cannot fetch URLs); replaced with paste-data approach
  (profile → clean_transform → analyse) with analysis_goal parameter
- translate-polish: added target_language and register parameters;
  added back-translation step for accuracy verification
- weekly-report: added team/audience parameters, richer extraction
  step, added Metrics and Notes sections
- content-pipeline: added audience/tone parameters, added outline step
  between research and writing
- content-review: fix category 'content' → 'creation'
- customer-support: fix category 'support' → 'business'

* style(workflows): convert all prompt_template strings to TOML multiline syntax

Replace \n escape sequences with real newlines using triple-quote
multiline strings ("""...""") across all 22 workflow templates.
No content changes — formatting only.

* style(hands): replace \n escape in reddit writer format example with multiline code block

workflows/api-design.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+id = "api-design"
+name = "API Design & Specification"
+description = "Design a REST API from requirements: endpoints, request/response schemas, auth, error handling, and OpenAPI spec."
+category = "engineering"
+tags = ["api", "design", "openapi", "engineering"]
+
+[i18n.zh]
+name = "API 设计与规范"
+description = "从需求出发设计 REST API：端点、请求/响应结构、认证、错误处理，输出 OpenAPI 规范。"
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "requirements"
+description = "Feature or product requirements the API needs to satisfy"
+param_type = "string"
+required = true
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "tech_stack"
+description = "Technology stack and any existing API conventions"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = ""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "resource_model"
+prompt_template = """
+You are an API architect. From the requirements below, identify the core resources and their relationships:
+1. List every resource (noun)
+2. Define attributes and types for each
+3. Map relationships (one-to-many, many-to-many)
+4. Identify which resources need CRUD vs. action-oriented endpoints
+
+Requirements:
+{{requirements}}
+
+Tech stack / conventions:
+{{tech_stack}}
+"""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "endpoint_design"
+prompt_template = """
+Design the full set of REST endpoints based on the resource model. For each endpoint specify:
+- Method + path
+- Path/query parameters
+- Request body schema (JSON)
+- Success response schema + status code
+- Error responses (4xx, 5xx)
+- Auth requirement
+- Idempotency and side-effect notes
+
+Resource model:
+{{resource_model}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["resource_model"]
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "openapi_spec"
+prompt_template = """
+Write a complete OpenAPI 3.1 YAML specification for the API designed above. Include:
+- info block with title, version, description
+- All paths with operations
+- Reusable schemas in components/schemas
+- Security schemes
+- Example request/response bodies
+
+Endpoint design:
+{{endpoint_design}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["endpoint_design"]

workflows/blog-post.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+id = "blog-post"
+name = "Blog Post Writer"
+description = "Research a topic, build a structured outline, write a full-length blog post, then optimise for SEO."
+category = "creation"
+tags = ["writing", "blog", "seo", "content"]
+
+[i18n.zh]
+name = "博客文章撰写"
+description = "调研主题，构建结构化提纲，撰写完整博客文章，并进行 SEO 优化。"
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "topic"
+description = "Blog post topic or working title"
+param_type = "string"
+required = true
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "audience"
+description = "Target audience and their expertise level"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = "general audience"
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "tone"
+description = "Desired tone (e.g. technical, conversational, authoritative)"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = "informative and engaging"
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "research"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a research journalist. For the blog topic below, compile:
+1. Key facts, statistics, and data points (with source type)
+2. Common misconceptions to debunk
+3. Expert perspectives and contrasting views
+4. Recent developments or trends
+5. Concrete examples and case studies
+6. Angles that haven't been covered well in existing content
+
+Topic: {{topic}}
+Audience: {{audience}}
+"""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "outline"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a content strategist. Create a detailed blog post outline:
+- Compelling headline (3 options)
+- Hook / opening angle
+- H2 sections with H3 subsections
+- Key point per section
+- Data or example to use in each section
+- Conclusion and CTA
+
+Target length: 1200-1800 words.
+Tone: {{tone}}
+Audience: {{audience}}
+
+Research:
+{{research}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["research"]
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "draft"
+prompt_template = """
+Write the full blog post following the outline. Guidelines:
+- Open with a hook that immediately addresses the reader's pain or curiosity
+- Use short paragraphs (3-4 sentences max)
+- Include the statistics and examples from research
+- Use subheadings to aid scannability
+- End with a clear takeaway and one actionable CTA
+- Tone: {{tone}}
+
+Outline:
+{{outline}}
+
+Research:
+{{research}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["outline", "research"]
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "seo_optimise"
+prompt_template = """
+SEO-optimise the blog post:
+1. **Primary keyword** — identify the best target keyword
+2. **Meta title** (under 60 chars) and **meta description** (under 155 chars)
+3. **Keyword placement** — suggest where to naturally insert the primary keyword and 3 secondary keywords
+4. **Internal link opportunities** — topics to link to
+5. **Image alt text suggestions** — 2-3 descriptive alts
+6. **Revised headline** if needed for keyword inclusion
+
+Draft:
+{{draft}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["draft"]

workflows/brainstorm.toml

@@ -16,14 +16,28 @@ required = true
 
 [[steps]]
 name = "idea_generator"
-prompt_template = "You are a creative strategist. For the following challenge, generate 10 diverse solution ideas. Include: 3 conventional approaches, 4 creative approaches, and 3 bold/unconventional approaches. For each idea, give a one-line title and a 2-sentence explanation.\n\nChallenge: {{challenge}}"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a creative strategist. For the following challenge, generate 10 diverse solution ideas. Include: 3 conventional approaches, 4 creative approaches, and 3 bold/unconventional approaches. For each idea, give a one-line title and a 2-sentence explanation.
+
+Challenge: {{challenge}}
+"""
 
 [[steps]]
 name = "evaluator"
-prompt_template = "You are a critical analyst. Evaluate each idea below on three criteria: Feasibility (1-5), Impact (1-5), Originality (1-5). Pick the top 3 ideas and for each provide: why it's promising, key risks, and concrete first steps to implement it.\n\nIdeas:\n{{idea_generator}}"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a critical analyst. Evaluate each idea below on three criteria: Feasibility (1-5), Impact (1-5), Originality (1-5). Pick the top 3 ideas and for each provide: why it's promising, key risks, and concrete first steps to implement it.
+
+Ideas:
+{{idea_generator}}
+"""
 depends_on = ["idea_generator"]
 
 [[steps]]
 name = "action_planner"
-prompt_template = "You are a project planner. Take the top-rated idea below and create a concrete action plan: 1) Clear goal statement 2) 5-step implementation roadmap with timelines 3) Required resources 4) Success metrics 5) Potential obstacles and mitigation strategies.\n\nEvaluation:\n{{evaluator}}"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a project planner. Take the top-rated idea below and create a concrete action plan: 1) Clear goal statement 2) 5-step implementation roadmap with timelines 3) Required resources 4) Success metrics 5) Potential obstacles and mitigation strategies.
+
+Evaluation:
+{{evaluator}}
+"""
 depends_on = ["evaluator"]

workflows/bug-triage.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+id = "bug-triage"
+name = "Bug Triage & Fix Plan"
+description = "Analyse a bug report, reproduce the failure path, identify root cause, and produce a prioritised fix plan with test cases."
+category = "engineering"
+tags = ["bug", "debugging", "triage", "engineering"]
+
+[i18n.zh]
+name = "Bug 分析与修复计划"
+description = "分析 Bug 报告，还原失败路径，定位根因，输出优先级排序的修复计划与测试用例。"
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "bug_report"
+description = "The bug report, error message, or stack trace"
+param_type = "string"
+required = true
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "codebase_context"
+description = "Relevant code snippets or architecture description"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = ""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "reproduce_path"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a senior engineer doing bug triage. Given the bug report below, reconstruct the exact failure path:
+1. Preconditions that must be true
+2. Step-by-step sequence that triggers the bug
+3. What the system does vs. what it should do
+4. Affected components and data flow
+
+Bug report:
+{{bug_report}}
+
+Codebase context:
+{{codebase_context}}
+"""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "root_cause"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a debugging expert. Based on the failure path analysis, identify the root cause:
+1. Immediate cause (the direct code/logic fault)
+2. Contributing factors (environment, race condition, assumption violation)
+3. Why this was not caught earlier (missing test, wrong assumption)
+4. Blast radius — what else could be affected
+
+Failure path:
+{{reproduce_path}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["reproduce_path"]
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "fix_plan"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a tech lead. Produce a concrete fix plan:
+1. **Recommended fix** — specific code change with rationale
+2. **Alternative approaches** — trade-offs of each
+3. **Test cases to add** — unit, integration, regression
+4. **Rollout recommendation** — hotfix vs. normal release, feature flag needed?
+5. **Prevention** — process or tooling changes to prevent recurrence
+
+Root cause analysis:
+{{root_cause}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["root_cause"]

workflows/code-review.toml

@@ -30,17 +30,69 @@ default = ""
 
 [[steps]]
 name = "review_correctness"
-prompt_template = "Review the following {{language}} code for correctness. Analyse:\n- Logic errors and edge cases\n- Error handling completeness\n- Null/undefined safety\n- Off-by-one errors and boundary conditions\n- Resource leaks (memory, file handles, connections)\n- Concurrency issues (race conditions, deadlocks)\n\nContext: {{context}}\n\nCode:\n{{code}}"
+prompt_template = """
+Review the following {{language}} code for correctness. Analyse:
+- Logic errors and edge cases
+- Error handling completeness
+- Null/undefined safety
+- Off-by-one errors and boundary conditions
+- Resource leaks (memory, file handles, connections)
+- Concurrency issues (race conditions, deadlocks)
+
+Context: {{context}}
+
+Code:
+{{code}}
+"""
 
 [[steps]]
 name = "review_security"
-prompt_template = "Perform a security review of the following {{language}} code. Check for:\n- Injection vulnerabilities (SQL, command, XSS)\n- Authentication and authorisation flaws\n- Sensitive data exposure (logging secrets, hardcoded credentials)\n- Input validation gaps\n- Insecure cryptographic usage\n- Path traversal and SSRF risks\n- Dependency vulnerabilities\n\nContext: {{context}}\n\nCode:\n{{code}}"
+prompt_template = """
+Perform a security review of the following {{language}} code. Check for:
+- Injection vulnerabilities (SQL, command, XSS)
+- Authentication and authorisation flaws
+- Sensitive data exposure (logging secrets, hardcoded credentials)
+- Input validation gaps
+- Insecure cryptographic usage
+- Path traversal and SSRF risks
+- Dependency vulnerabilities
+
+Context: {{context}}
+
+Code:
+{{code}}
+"""
 
 [[steps]]
 name = "review_style"
-prompt_template = "Review the following {{language}} code for style and maintainability. Evaluate:\n- Naming conventions and clarity\n- Function/method length and complexity\n- Code duplication\n- Documentation and comments quality\n- Consistent formatting\n- Appropriate use of language idioms\n- API design and public interface clarity\n\nContext: {{context}}\n\nCode:\n{{code}}"
+prompt_template = """
+Review the following {{language}} code for style and maintainability. Evaluate:
+- Naming conventions and clarity
+- Function/method length and complexity
+- Code duplication
+- Documentation and comments quality
+- Consistent formatting
+- Appropriate use of language idioms
+- API design and public interface clarity
+
+Context: {{context}}
+
+Code:
+{{code}}
+"""
 
 [[steps]]
 name = "synthesise"
-prompt_template = "Synthesise the three independent code review analyses below into a unified review summary. Prioritise findings by severity (critical, high, medium, low). Remove duplicates across analyses. Produce a final verdict: approve, request-changes, or needs-discussion.\n\nCorrectness review:\n{{review_correctness}}\n\nSecurity review:\n{{review_security}}\n\nStyle review:\n{{review_style}}"
+prompt_template = """
+Synthesise the three independent code review analyses below into a unified review summary. Prioritise findings by severity (critical, high, medium, low). Remove duplicates across analyses. Produce a final verdict: approve, request-changes, or needs-discussion.
+
+Correctness review:
+{{review_correctness}}
+
+Security review:
+{{review_security}}
+
+Style review:
+{{review_style}}
+"""
 depends_on = ["review_correctness", "review_security", "review_style"]

workflows/competitor-analysis.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+id = "competitor-analysis"
+name = "Competitor Analysis"
+description = "Research competitors, map their strengths and weaknesses, and produce a strategic positioning report."
+category = "business"
+tags = ["strategy", "market", "competitive", "business"]
+
+[i18n.zh]
+name = "竞品分析"
+description = "调研竞争对手，梳理其优劣势，输出战略定位报告。"
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "product"
+description = "Your product or business and its target market"
+param_type = "string"
+required = true
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "competitors"
+description = "List of competitors to analyse (names or URLs)"
+param_type = "string"
+required = true
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "competitor_profiles"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a market analyst. For each competitor listed, create a profile:
+- Core product and value proposition
+- Target customer segment
+- Pricing model and tiers
+- Key features and differentiators
+- Known weaknesses or complaints (from reviews, forums)
+- Go-to-market strategy
+- Estimated market share or traction signals
+
+Our product: {{product}}
+Competitors: {{competitors}}
+"""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "swot_comparison"
+prompt_template = """
+Perform a comparative SWOT analysis:
+1. For each competitor: their Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities they exploit, Threats they face
+2. Our position relative to each on: product depth, pricing, UX, distribution, brand
+3. Whitespace — what pain points do all competitors fail to address?
+
+Competitor profiles:
+{{competitor_profiles}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["competitor_profiles"]
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "strategy_report"
+prompt_template = """
+Write a strategic positioning report:
+
+## Market Landscape
+Summary of the competitive field.
+
+## Our Differentiation
+Where we win, where we are at parity, where we lag.
+
+## Attack Vectors
+3 specific opportunities to take share from each competitor.
+
+## Defensive Priorities
+What strengths to reinforce before competitors close the gap.
+
+## Recommended Positioning Statement
+One sentence that clearly differentiates us from all listed competitors.
+
+## 90-Day Action Items
+Top 5 concrete actions sorted by impact.
+
+SWOT comparison:
+{{swot_comparison}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["swot_comparison"]

workflows/content-pipeline.toml

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 id = "content-pipeline"
 name = "Content Creation Pipeline"
-description = "Research → Write → Edit pipeline for article creation"
+description = "Research a topic, build a structured outline, write a full article, then edit for clarity, flow, and factual consistency."
 category = "creation"
-tags = ["content", "writing", "article"]
+tags = ["content", "writing", "article", "research"]
 
 [i18n.zh]
 name = "内容创作流水线"
-description = "调研 -> 撰写 -> 编辑的文章创作流水线"
+description = "调研主题，构建结构化提纲，撰写完整文章，再编辑润色以提升清晰度、流畅性和事实准确性。"
 
 [[parameters]]
 name = "topic"
@@ -14,6 +14,13 @@ description = "The topic to research and write about"
 param_type = "string"
 required = true
 
+[[parameters]]
+name = "audience"
+description = "Target audience (e.g. general public, developers, executives, students)"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = "general audience"
+
 [[parameters]]
 name = "word_count"
 description = "Target word count for the article"
@@ -21,16 +28,80 @@ param_type = "string"
 required = false
 default = "800-1200"
 
-[[steps]]
-name = "researcher"
-prompt_template = "You are a research assistant. Research the following topic thoroughly and provide: 1) Background and context 2) Key facts and data points 3) Different perspectives on the topic 4) Recent developments. Be specific and detailed.\n\nTopic: {{topic}}"
+[[parameters]]
+name = "tone"
+description = "Desired tone (informative, conversational, technical, persuasive)"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = "informative"
 
 [[steps]]
-name = "writer"
-prompt_template = "You are a professional writer. Based on the research below, write a well-structured article ({{word_count}} words). Include: a compelling headline, an engaging introduction, clear sections with subheadings, and a strong conclusion. Write in a clear, accessible style.\n\nResearch:\n{{researcher}}"
+name = "researcher"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a research journalist. Investigate the following topic for a {{audience}} audience:
+1. Background and context — why this topic matters now
+2. Key facts and data points (be specific)
+3. Multiple perspectives — mainstream view, contrarian view, expert consensus
+4. Recent developments or trends
+5. Concrete examples, case studies, or anecdotes
+6. Common misconceptions to address
+
+Topic: {{topic}}
+"""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "outline"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a content strategist. Create a detailed article outline using the research below.
+
+Include:
+- Three headline options (hook-driven, question-based, and statement-based)
+- Opening hook strategy
+- H2 sections with H3 subsections and the key point each section makes
+- Which research fact or example belongs in each section
+- Closing argument and call to action
+
+Target: {{word_count}} words, {{tone}} tone, audience: {{audience}}
+
+Research:
+{{researcher}}
+"""
 depends_on = ["researcher"]
 
+[[steps]]
+name = "writer"
+prompt_template = """
+Write the full article following the outline. Requirements:
+- Use the best headline from the outline
+- Open with the hook strategy from the outline
+- Short paragraphs (3-4 sentences max)
+- Subheadings for each major section
+- Weave in the specific facts and examples from research — no vague generalities
+- Match the {{tone}} tone throughout
+- End with a concrete takeaway and CTA relevant to a {{audience}} reader
+- Target length: {{word_count}} words
+
+Outline:
+{{outline}}
+
+Research:
+{{researcher}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["outline", "researcher"]
+
 [[steps]]
 name = "editor"
-prompt_template = "You are a senior editor. Review and polish the following article. Fix any grammar issues, improve flow, tighten wordy sentences, and ensure factual consistency. Output the final polished version only, no commentary.\n\nDraft:\n{{writer}}"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a senior editor. Polish the article below:
+1. Fix grammar, punctuation, and spelling
+2. Tighten wordy or repetitive sentences
+3. Improve transitions between sections
+4. Flag any factual claims that seem unsupported and suggest how to strengthen them
+5. Verify the tone is consistent with '{{tone}}' throughout
+
+Output the final polished article only, then add a brief editor's note listing the main changes made.
+
+Draft:
+{{writer}}
+"""
 depends_on = ["writer"]

workflows/content-review.toml

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 id = "content-review"
 name = "Content Review"
 description = "Multi-agent content review pipeline that drafts, reviews for quality and accuracy, then produces a final edited version incorporating feedback."
-category = "content"
+category = "creation"
 tags = ["content", "review", "writing", "editing"]
 
 [i18n.zh]
@@ -34,15 +34,36 @@ prompt_template = "Write a {{tone}} article about {{topic}} with approximately {
 
 [[steps]]
 name = "review_quality"
-prompt_template = "Review the following draft for writing quality. Evaluate clarity, coherence, grammar, tone consistency (target: {{tone}}), and overall readability. Provide specific, actionable feedback with line-level suggestions.\n\nDraft:\n{{draft}}"
+prompt_template = """
+Review the following draft for writing quality. Evaluate clarity, coherence, grammar, tone consistency (target: {{tone}}), and overall readability. Provide specific, actionable feedback with line-level suggestions.
+
+Draft:
+{{draft}}
+"""
 depends_on = ["draft"]
 
 [[steps]]
 name = "review_accuracy"
-prompt_template = "Review the following draft for factual accuracy and logical consistency. Flag any claims that appear unsupported, statistics that need citation, logical fallacies, or misleading statements. List each issue with a suggested correction.\n\nDraft:\n{{draft}}"
+prompt_template = """
+Review the following draft for factual accuracy and logical consistency. Flag any claims that appear unsupported, statistics that need citation, logical fallacies, or misleading statements. List each issue with a suggested correction.
+
+Draft:
+{{draft}}
+"""
 depends_on = ["draft"]
 
 [[steps]]
 name = "final_edit"
-prompt_template = "Produce a final edited version of the draft below, incorporating the quality and accuracy feedback. Preserve the original voice and intent while addressing all identified issues.\n\nOriginal draft:\n{{draft}}\n\nQuality feedback:\n{{review_quality}}\n\nAccuracy feedback:\n{{review_accuracy}}"
+prompt_template = """
+Produce a final edited version of the draft below, incorporating the quality and accuracy feedback. Preserve the original voice and intent while addressing all identified issues.
+
+Original draft:
+{{draft}}
+
+Quality feedback:
+{{review_quality}}
+
+Accuracy feedback:
+{{review_accuracy}}
+"""
 depends_on = ["review_quality", "review_accuracy"]

workflows/customer-support.toml

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 id = "customer-support"
 name = "Customer Support Triage"
 description = "Tiered customer support pipeline that classifies incoming requests by urgency and category, drafts an appropriate response, and escalates complex issues to a specialist."
-category = "support"
+category = "business"
 tags = ["support", "triage", "customer-service", "escalation"]
 
 [i18n.zh]
@@ -30,14 +30,49 @@ default = ""
 
 [[steps]]
 name = "classify"
-prompt_template = "Classify the following customer support request. Determine:\n1. Category: billing, technical, account, feature-request, bug-report, or general\n2. Urgency: low, medium, high, critical\n3. Sentiment: positive, neutral, frustrated, angry\n4. Whether escalation to a human specialist is needed (true/false)\n\nReturn a structured assessment with reasoning for each classification.\n\nProduct context: {{product_context}}\n\nCustomer message:\n{{customer_message}}"
+prompt_template = """
+Classify the following customer support request. Determine:
+1. Category: billing, technical, account, feature-request, bug-report, or general
+2. Urgency: low, medium, high, critical
+3. Sentiment: positive, neutral, frustrated, angry
+4. Whether escalation to a human specialist is needed (true/false)
+
+Return a structured assessment with reasoning for each classification.
+
+Product context: {{product_context}}
+
+Customer message:
+{{customer_message}}
+"""
 
 [[steps]]
 name = "draft_response"
-prompt_template = "Draft a helpful, empathetic support response for {{customer_name}} based on the classification below. The response should:\n- Acknowledge the customer's concern\n- Provide a clear solution or next steps\n- Match the appropriate tone for the detected sentiment\n- Include specific action items\n\nClassification:\n{{classify}}\n\nOriginal message:\n{{customer_message}}"
+prompt_template = """
+Draft a helpful, empathetic support response for {{customer_name}} based on the classification below. The response should:
+- Acknowledge the customer's concern
+- Provide a clear solution or next steps
+- Match the appropriate tone for the detected sentiment
+- Include specific action items
+
+Classification:
+{{classify}}
+
+Original message:
+{{customer_message}}
+"""
 depends_on = ["classify"]
 
 [[steps]]
 name = "escalation_check"
-prompt_template = "Review the classification and drafted response below. Determine if this case requires escalation beyond automated support. If escalation is needed, prepare a concise internal handoff note for the specialist team that includes: summary, category, urgency, customer sentiment, attempted resolution, and recommended next steps.\n\nIf no escalation is needed, confirm the drafted response is complete and ready to send.\n\nClassification:\n{{classify}}\n\nDrafted response:\n{{draft_response}}"
+prompt_template = """
+Review the classification and drafted response below. Determine if this case requires escalation beyond automated support. If escalation is needed, prepare a concise internal handoff note for the specialist team that includes: summary, category, urgency, customer sentiment, attempted resolution, and recommended next steps.
+
+If no escalation is needed, confirm the drafted response is complete and ready to send.
+
+Classification:
+{{classify}}
+
+Drafted response:
+{{draft_response}}
+"""
 depends_on = ["classify", "draft_response"]

workflows/data-pipeline.toml

@@ -1,36 +1,82 @@
 id = "data-pipeline"
-name = "Data Pipeline"
-description = "ETL pipeline that extracts data from a source, transforms it into a target format, and validates the output for completeness and correctness."
-category = "data"
-tags = ["etl", "data", "pipeline", "transform"]
+name = "Data Analysis & Transform"
+description = "Clean, transform, analyse, and summarise raw data. Handles messy inputs: CSV, JSON, tables, or free-form text."
+category = "engineering"
+tags = ["data", "analysis", "transform", "etl"]
 
 [i18n.zh]
-name = "数据流水线"
-description = "ETL 流水线，从数据源提取数据，转换为目标格式，并验证输出的完整性和正确性。"
+name = "数据分析与转换"
+description = "清洗、转换、分析并摘要原始数据，支持 CSV、JSON、表格或自由文本等杂乱输入。"
 
 [[parameters]]
-name = "data_source"
-description = "URL or file path to the data source"
+name = "raw_data"
+description = "The raw data to process (paste CSV, JSON, table, or any structured text)"
 param_type = "string"
 required = true
 
 [[parameters]]
 name = "output_format"
-description = "Desired output format (json, csv, markdown)"
+description = "Desired output format for the transformed data (json, csv, markdown-table)"
 param_type = "string"
 required = false
 default = "json"
 
-[[steps]]
-name = "extract"
-prompt_template = "Extract raw data from the following source: {{data_source}}. Return the complete dataset without any transformation, preserving the original structure."
+[[parameters]]
+name = "analysis_goal"
+description = "What you want to understand or extract from the data"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = "general summary and key insights"
 
 [[steps]]
-name = "transform"
-prompt_template = "Transform the following raw data into well-structured {{output_format}} format. Apply standard cleaning: trim whitespace, normalise dates to ISO-8601, remove duplicate rows, and convert empty strings to null.\n\nRaw data:\n{{extract}}"
-depends_on = ["extract"]
+name = "profile"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a data engineer. Profile the following raw data:
+1. Detected format and structure
+2. Number of rows and columns/fields
+3. Data types per field
+4. Missing value count per field
+5. Obvious data quality issues (duplicates, inconsistent formatting, out-of-range values)
+6. Sample of first 5 rows for reference
+
+Raw data:
+{{raw_data}}
+"""
 
 [[steps]]
-name = "validate"
-prompt_template = "Validate the transformed data below for completeness and correctness. Check for: missing required fields, type mismatches, invalid date formats, out-of-range values, and referential integrity. Return a validation report with pass/fail status and any issues found.\n\nTransformed data:\n{{transform}}"
-depends_on = ["transform"]
+name = "clean_transform"
+prompt_template = """
+Clean and transform the raw data based on the profile below. Apply:
+- Trim whitespace from string fields
+- Normalise dates to ISO-8601
+- Remove exact duplicate rows
+- Convert empty strings to null
+- Standardise inconsistent categorical values (e.g. 'Y'/'Yes'/'yes' → true)
+- Flag but preserve rows with suspicious values (do not silently drop them)
+
+Output the cleaned data in {{output_format}} format, followed by a change log listing every transformation applied.
+
+Data profile:
+{{profile}}
+
+Raw data:
+{{raw_data}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["profile"]
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "analyse"
+prompt_template = """
+Analyse the cleaned data to address the following goal: {{analysis_goal}}
+
+Provide:
+1. Key statistics (counts, totals, averages, distributions as appropriate)
+2. Notable patterns or trends
+3. Outliers or anomalies worth investigating
+4. Correlations between fields (if applicable)
+5. Top 3 actionable insights from the data
+
+Cleaned data:
+{{clean_transform}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["clean_transform"]

workflows/decision-matrix.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+id = "decision-matrix"
+name = "Decision Matrix"
+description = "Evaluate competing options against weighted criteria to produce a clear, defensible recommendation."
+category = "thinking"
+tags = ["decision", "analysis", "strategy", "thinking"]
+
+[i18n.zh]
+name = "决策矩阵"
+description = "对竞争方案按加权标准进行评估，输出清晰、有据可查的推荐结论。"
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "decision"
+description = "The decision to be made and its context"
+param_type = "string"
+required = true
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "options"
+description = "The options or alternatives being considered"
+param_type = "string"
+required = true
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "criteria"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a decision analyst. For the decision below, define the evaluation criteria:
+1. List 5-8 criteria that matter most for this decision
+2. For each criterion: define what 'good' looks like (high score) and 'bad' looks like (low score)
+3. Assign weights (must sum to 100%) based on business importance
+4. Note which criteria are must-haves (disqualifiers if failed)
+
+Decision: {{decision}}
+Options: {{options}}
+"""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "scoring"
+prompt_template = """
+Score each option against each criterion on a 1-10 scale. Justify every score with one sentence of evidence or reasoning. Then calculate weighted scores.
+
+Format as a table: Option | Criterion | Raw Score | Weight | Weighted Score.
+
+Add a totals row per option.
+
+Decision: {{decision}}
+Options: {{options}}
+
+Criteria and weights:
+{{criteria}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["criteria"]
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "recommendation"
+prompt_template = """
+Synthesise the analysis into a decision memo:
+
+## Recommendation
+Clear winner with one-sentence rationale.
+
+## Why Not the Others
+For each non-recommended option: the decisive weakness.
+
+## Key Risks of the Recommended Option
+Top 3 risks and mitigations.
+
+## Conditions That Would Change This Recommendation
+What new information would flip the decision.
+
+## Next Steps
+3 immediate actions to execute the decision.
+
+Scoring:
+{{scoring}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["scoring"]

workflows/incident-postmortem.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+id = "incident-postmortem"
+name = "Incident Postmortem"
+description = "Turn raw incident notes into a structured postmortem: timeline, root cause, impact assessment, and action items."
+category = "engineering"
+tags = ["incident", "postmortem", "devops", "reliability"]
+
+[i18n.zh]
+name = "故障复盘"
+description = "将原始故障记录整理为结构化复盘报告：时间线、根因分析、影响评估和行动项。"
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "incident_notes"
+description = "Raw notes, chat logs, or timeline from the incident"
+param_type = "string"
+required = true
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "service_name"
+description = "Name of the affected service or system"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = ""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "timeline"
+prompt_template = """
+You are an SRE writing a postmortem. From the raw incident notes below, reconstruct a clean chronological timeline:
+- Format: [HH:MM UTC] — event description
+- Include: first alert, detection, escalation, mitigation steps, resolution
+- Note who was involved at each stage
+- Mark the start and end of user impact
+
+Service: {{service_name}}
+
+Raw notes:
+{{incident_notes}}
+"""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "root_cause_analysis"
+prompt_template = """
+Perform a thorough root cause analysis using the 5-Whys method:
+1. Immediate trigger
+2. Five-whys chain down to the systemic root cause
+3. Contributing factors (monitoring gaps, process failures, dependency issues)
+4. Detection gap — why it took as long as it did to detect
+
+Timeline:
+{{timeline}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["timeline"]
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "postmortem_report"
+prompt_template = """
+Write a complete postmortem report with these sections:
+
+## Summary
+One paragraph: what happened, impact, duration, resolution.
+
+## Impact
+Quantified: users affected, error rate, revenue/SLA impact.
+
+## Timeline
+(Use the timeline above)
+
+## Root Cause
+(Use the RCA above)
+
+## What Went Well
+## What Went Wrong
+## Action Items
+Table: | Action | Owner | Priority | Due date |
+Minimum 5 concrete, measurable actions.
+
+## Lessons Learned
+
+Timeline:
+{{timeline}}
+
+Root cause analysis:
+{{root_cause_analysis}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["timeline", "root_cause_analysis"]

workflows/job-application.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+id = "job-application"
+name = "Job Application Package"
+description = "Tailor a resume and cover letter to a specific job posting, then prepare targeted interview talking points."
+category = "productivity"
+tags = ["career", "resume", "job", "interview"]
+
+[i18n.zh]
+name = "求职材料准备"
+description = "针对特定职位定制简历和求职信，并准备有针对性的面试谈话要点。"
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "job_posting"
+description = "The full job posting or description"
+param_type = "string"
+required = true
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "resume"
+description = "Your current resume or experience summary"
+param_type = "string"
+required = true
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "job_analysis"
+prompt_template = """
+Analyse the job posting as an experienced recruiter:
+1. **Must-have requirements** — skills/experience that are non-negotiable
+2. **Nice-to-have requirements** — preferred but not required
+3. **Company signals** — culture, values, team dynamics from the language used
+4. **Role signals** — what success looks like in 90 days, key challenges
+5. **Keywords** — ATS-critical terms to include in application materials
+6. **Red flags** — anything unusual or concerning in the posting
+
+Job posting:
+{{job_posting}}
+"""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "resume_tailoring"
+prompt_template = """
+Tailor the resume for this specific role:
+1. **Reorder sections** — put most relevant experience first
+2. **Rewrite bullet points** — for each experience, suggest stronger versions that match job keywords
+3. **Quantify impacts** — flag any bullet points that should have metrics added
+4. **Gaps to address** — experience or skills missing vs. the role requirements
+5. **Summary statement** — write a 3-sentence tailored summary for the top of the resume
+
+Job analysis:
+{{job_analysis}}
+
+Resume:
+{{resume}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["job_analysis"]
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "cover_letter"
+prompt_template = """
+Write a compelling cover letter (3-4 paragraphs, under 400 words):
+- Opening: specific hook connecting your background to the company's mission
+- Body: 2 concrete achievements that directly address the job's must-haves
+- Closing: clear ask + why this specific company
+
+Avoid clichés like 'I am writing to apply' or 'I am a hard worker'.
+
+Job analysis:
+{{job_analysis}}
+
+Resume:
+{{resume}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["job_analysis"]
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "interview_prep"
+prompt_template = """
+Prepare interview talking points:
+1. **STAR stories** — 3 specific situations from the resume mapped to the job's key requirements
+2. **Questions to ask** — 5 smart questions that show deep interest
+3. **Difficult questions** — likely tough questions for this role with suggested answers
+4. **Salary research** — how to position compensation discussion
+
+Job analysis:
+{{job_analysis}}
+
+Resume:
+{{resume}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["job_analysis", "resume_tailoring"]

workflows/learning-plan.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+id = "learning-plan"
+name = "Personalised Learning Plan"
+description = "Assess current knowledge, identify gaps, and build a structured learning roadmap with resources and milestones."
+category = "productivity"
+tags = ["learning", "education", "planning", "productivity"]
+
+[i18n.zh]
+name = "个性化学习计划"
+description = "评估当前知识水平，识别差距，构建带资源和里程碑的结构化学习路线图。"
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "skill"
+description = "The skill or subject to learn"
+param_type = "string"
+required = true
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "current_level"
+description = "Your current knowledge and experience with this topic"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = "complete beginner"
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "goal"
+description = "What you want to be able to do once you've learned it"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = "professional proficiency"
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "time_available"
+description = "Hours per week available for learning"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = "5 hours per week"
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "gap_analysis"
+prompt_template = """
+You are an expert educator in {{skill}}. Analyse the learner's situation:
+1. **Knowledge map** — the full topic broken into sub-skills and concepts
+2. **Current position** — what they likely know given their stated level
+3. **Target position** — what they need to know to reach their goal
+4. **Critical gaps** — the 5 most important things to learn first
+5. **Common pitfalls** — mistakes beginners make, concepts people find hardest
+
+Skill: {{skill}}
+Current level: {{current_level}}
+Goal: {{goal}}
+"""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "roadmap"
+prompt_template = """
+Design a learning roadmap divided into phases. For each phase:
+- Name and duration estimate
+- Learning objectives (what they'll be able to do)
+- Core concepts to master
+- 3-5 specific resources (books, courses, docs, tutorials — real names where possible)
+- Practice project or exercise
+- How to know the phase is complete (milestone)
+
+Time available: {{time_available}}
+
+Gap analysis:
+{{gap_analysis}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["gap_analysis"]
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "week1_plan"
+prompt_template = """
+Create a concrete day-by-day plan for the first week of learning. For each day:
+- Specific topic to cover
+- Exact resource to use (chapter, video, section)
+- Time estimate
+- Exercise or thing to build/practice
+- End-of-day check: how to verify understanding
+
+Assume {{time_available}} is available.
+
+Roadmap:
+{{roadmap}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["roadmap"]

workflows/market-research.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+id = "market-research"
+name = "Market Research Report"
+description = "Analyse a market opportunity: size, trends, customer segments, key players, and go-to-market entry points."
+category = "business"
+tags = ["market", "research", "strategy", "business"]
+
+[i18n.zh]
+name = "市场调研报告"
+description = "分析市场机会：市场规模、趋势、客户细分、主要参与者和进入市场的切入点。"
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "market"
+description = "The market or industry to research"
+param_type = "string"
+required = true
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "business_context"
+description = "Your company, product, or investment thesis context"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = ""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "market_landscape"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a market research analyst. Map the current landscape for: {{market}}
+
+1. **Market definition** — precise scope and adjacent markets
+2. **Market size** — TAM, SAM, SOM estimates with methodology
+3. **Growth rate** — historical and projected CAGR
+4. **Maturity stage** — emerging / growth / mature / declining
+5. **Key trends** — top 5 forces shaping the market (technology, regulation, behaviour)
+6. **Geographic distribution** — where activity is concentrated
+
+Context: {{business_context}}
+"""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "customer_segments"
+prompt_template = """
+Identify and profile the customer segments in this market:
+
+For each segment (aim for 3-5):
+- Name and size
+- Demographics/firmographics
+- Key pain points and jobs-to-be-done
+- Current solutions they use
+- Willingness to pay signals
+- Acquisition channels
+- Which segment is most underserved
+
+Market landscape:
+{{market_landscape}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["market_landscape"]
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "research_report"
+prompt_template = """
+Write a structured market research report:
+
+## Executive Summary
+3 bullet points: opportunity, risk, recommended entry point.
+
+## Market Overview
+## Customer Segments
+## Competitive Landscape
+Top players by segment, their moats and vulnerabilities.
+
+## Market Entry Analysis
+- Best beachhead segment
+- Entry barriers and how to overcome them
+- Differentiation opportunities
+- Estimated time to meaningful traction
+
+## Key Risks
+## Recommended Next Steps
+
+Market landscape:
+{{market_landscape}}
+
+Customer segments:
+{{customer_segments}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["market_landscape", "customer_segments"]

workflows/meeting-summary.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+id = "meeting-summary"
+name = "Meeting Summary & Action Items"
+description = "Transform raw meeting notes or transcript into a structured summary, decisions log, and follow-up email."
+category = "productivity"
+tags = ["meeting", "notes", "productivity", "collaboration"]
+
+[i18n.zh]
+name = "会议纪要与行动项"
+description = "将原始会议记录或转录文本整理为结构化摘要、决策日志和跟进邮件。"
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "notes"
+description = "Raw meeting notes or transcript"
+param_type = "string"
+required = true
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "meeting_context"
+description = "Meeting type, attendees, and goal (optional)"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = ""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "structured_summary"
+prompt_template = """
+You are an executive assistant. From the raw meeting notes below, extract:
+
+**Key Discussion Points** — 3-7 bullet points on what was discussed
+**Decisions Made** — each decision with rationale and who decided
+**Open Questions** — unresolved items that need follow-up
+**Blockers & Risks** — anything flagged as blocking progress
+
+Context: {{meeting_context}}
+
+Notes:
+{{notes}}
+"""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "action_items"
+prompt_template = """
+Extract all action items from the meeting. For each:
+- Action: specific, measurable task
+- Owner: person responsible (use name from notes)
+- Due date: explicit date or relative (e.g. 'by next Friday')
+- Priority: High / Medium / Low
+- Dependencies: what must happen first
+
+Format as a table.
+
+Summary:
+{{structured_summary}}
+
+Notes:
+{{notes}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["structured_summary"]
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "followup_email"
+prompt_template = """
+Write a professional follow-up email to send to all attendees. Include:
+- Subject line
+- Brief recap (2-3 sentences)
+- Decisions section
+- Action items table (owner, task, due date)
+- Next steps / next meeting placeholder
+
+Keep tone professional but concise. Use the attendees' first names.
+
+Summary:
+{{structured_summary}}
+
+Action items:
+{{action_items}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["structured_summary", "action_items"]

workflows/product-spec.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+id = "product-spec"
+name = "Product Spec Writer"
+description = "Turn a product idea or feature request into a complete PRD: user stories, acceptance criteria, technical notes, and open questions."
+category = "business"
+tags = ["product", "prd", "planning", "engineering"]
+
+[i18n.zh]
+name = "产品需求文档撰写"
+description = "将产品想法或功能需求转化为完整 PRD：用户故事、验收标准、技术备注和待确认事项。"
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "feature_idea"
+description = "Feature idea or problem statement to spec out"
+param_type = "string"
+required = true
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "context"
+description = "Product context, target users, and any constraints"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = ""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "problem_definition"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a senior product manager. Define the problem clearly:
+1. **Problem statement** — one precise sentence
+2. **Who has this problem** — user segments and their specific pain
+3. **Current workarounds** — how users cope today
+4. **Why now** — why is this worth solving now
+5. **Success looks like** — quantifiable outcomes
+6. **Out of scope** — what this will deliberately not solve
+
+Idea: {{feature_idea}}
+Context: {{context}}
+"""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "user_stories"
+prompt_template = """
+Write user stories in the format: As a [user type], I want to [action] so that [outcome].
+
+For each story:
+- Given / When / Then acceptance criteria (3-5 criteria)
+- Priority: P0 (must-have) / P1 (should-have) / P2 (nice-to-have)
+- Estimated complexity: S / M / L / XL
+
+Write at least 6 user stories covering happy paths, edge cases, and error states.
+
+Problem definition:
+{{problem_definition}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["problem_definition"]
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "prd"
+prompt_template = """
+Write a complete Product Requirements Document:
+
+## Overview
+## Problem Statement
+## Goals & Non-Goals
+## User Stories
+(from above)
+## Functional Requirements
+Numbered list of specific behaviours the system must exhibit.
+## Non-Functional Requirements
+Performance, security, accessibility, internationalisation.
+## Technical Considerations
+Known constraints, integration points, migration needs.
+## Metrics
+How success will be measured (leading and lagging indicators).
+## Open Questions
+Decisions still needed, with suggested owners.
+## Timeline Sketch
+Phases with rough scope.
+
+Problem definition:
+{{problem_definition}}
+
+User stories:
+{{user_stories}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["problem_definition", "user_stories"]

workflows/refactor-plan.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+id = "refactor-plan"
+name = "Refactor Plan"
+description = "Analyse code for quality issues, prioritise refactoring opportunities, and produce a safe incremental migration plan."
+category = "engineering"
+tags = ["refactoring", "code-quality", "engineering", "architecture"]
+
+[i18n.zh]
+name = "重构计划"
+description = "分析代码质量问题，优先排序重构机会，制定安全的增量迁移计划。"
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "code"
+description = "Code to refactor"
+param_type = "string"
+required = true
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "context"
+description = "Why refactoring is being considered (performance, maintainability, tech debt)"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = "general code quality improvement"
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "smell_analysis"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a senior software architect performing a code quality audit. Identify all code smells and issues:
+
+For each issue found:
+- Category: naming / duplication / complexity / coupling / abstraction / performance / security
+- Severity: critical / high / medium / low
+- Location: function/class name
+- Description: what is wrong
+- Impact: why it matters
+
+Context: {{context}}
+
+Code:
+{{code}}
+"""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "prioritised_opportunities"
+prompt_template = """
+Prioritise refactoring opportunities by: (impact × risk_reduction) / effort.
+
+For the top 5 opportunities:
+- What to change
+- Expected benefit
+- Estimated effort: hours
+- Risk level: low / medium / high
+- Prerequisites: what must be done first
+- Whether tests are needed before refactoring
+
+Smell analysis:
+{{smell_analysis}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["smell_analysis"]
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "migration_plan"
+prompt_template = """
+Design an incremental refactoring plan that keeps the system working throughout:
+
+**Phase 1 — Safety net** (tests and coverage)
+**Phase 2 — Low-risk quick wins**
+**Phase 3 — Structural changes**
+**Phase 4 — Validation and cleanup**
+
+For each phase:
+- Specific changes in order
+- How to verify nothing broke after each change
+- Rollback strategy
+- Definition of done
+
+Also note: what NOT to change in this refactoring cycle.
+
+Prioritised opportunities:
+{{prioritised_opportunities}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["prioritised_opportunities"]

workflows/research.toml

@@ -30,18 +30,49 @@ default = "general"
 
 [[steps]]
 name = "research_primary"
-prompt_template = "Conduct {{depth}}-level research on the following topic. Identify key facts, major viewpoints, recent developments, and relevant data points. Organise findings into clear sections with source attribution where possible.\n\nTopic: {{topic}}"
+prompt_template = """
+Conduct {{depth}}-level research on the following topic. Identify key facts, major viewpoints, recent developments, and relevant data points. Organise findings into clear sections with source attribution where possible.
+
+Topic: {{topic}}
+"""
 
 [[steps]]
 name = "research_counter"
-prompt_template = "Investigate counter-arguments, alternative perspectives, and potential criticisms related to the following topic. Identify areas of genuine controversy or debate, and note any commonly cited claims that are misleading or outdated.\n\nTopic: {{topic}}"
+prompt_template = """
+Investigate counter-arguments, alternative perspectives, and potential criticisms related to the following topic. Identify areas of genuine controversy or debate, and note any commonly cited claims that are misleading or outdated.
+
+Topic: {{topic}}
+"""
 
 [[steps]]
 name = "fact_check"
-prompt_template = "Cross-check the following research findings for factual accuracy. For each major claim, assess confidence level (confirmed, likely, uncertain, disputed). Flag any contradictions between the primary research and counter-arguments. Note any claims that require additional verification.\n\nPrimary research:\n{{research_primary}}\n\nCounter-arguments:\n{{research_counter}}"
+prompt_template = """
+Cross-check the following research findings for factual accuracy. For each major claim, assess confidence level (confirmed, likely, uncertain, disputed). Flag any contradictions between the primary research and counter-arguments. Note any claims that require additional verification.
+
+Primary research:
+{{research_primary}}
+
+Counter-arguments:
+{{research_counter}}
+"""
 depends_on = ["research_primary", "research_counter"]
 
 [[steps]]
 name = "summarise"
-prompt_template = "Produce a concise executive summary suitable for a {{audience}} audience. Incorporate verified findings from the fact-check step. Structure as:\n1. Key takeaways (3-5 bullet points)\n2. Detailed analysis with confidence levels\n3. Areas of uncertainty or debate\n4. Recommendations for further investigation\n\nFact-checked research:\n{{fact_check}}\n\nPrimary findings:\n{{research_primary}}\n\nAlternative perspectives:\n{{research_counter}}"
+prompt_template = """
+Produce a concise executive summary suitable for a {{audience}} audience. Incorporate verified findings from the fact-check step. Structure as:
+1. Key takeaways (3-5 bullet points)
+2. Detailed analysis with confidence levels
+3. Areas of uncertainty or debate
+4. Recommendations for further investigation
+
+Fact-checked research:
+{{fact_check}}
+
+Primary findings:
+{{research_primary}}
+
+Alternative perspectives:
+{{research_counter}}
+"""
 depends_on = ["fact_check"]

workflows/test-generation.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+id = "test-generation"
+name = "Test Suite Generation"
+description = "Analyse code to generate comprehensive unit tests, integration tests, and edge case coverage."
+category = "engineering"
+tags = ["testing", "quality", "engineering", "tdd"]
+
+[i18n.zh]
+name = "测试用例生成"
+description = "分析代码，生成完整的单元测试、集成测试和边界情况覆盖。"
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "code"
+description = "Source code to generate tests for"
+param_type = "string"
+required = true
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "language"
+description = "Programming language and test framework to use"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = "auto-detect"
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "code_analysis"
+prompt_template = """
+Analyse the following {{language}} code as a QA engineer:
+1. List every public function/method and its contract (inputs → outputs)
+2. Identify all branches and conditional paths
+3. Note external dependencies that need mocking
+4. Flag complex logic most likely to contain bugs
+5. List data types and their valid/invalid ranges
+
+Code:
+{{code}}
+"""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "edge_cases"
+prompt_template = """
+Based on the code analysis, enumerate all edge cases and boundary conditions:
+- Null/empty/zero inputs
+- Maximum/minimum values
+- Concurrent access scenarios
+- Error propagation paths
+- State machine transitions
+- External dependency failures
+
+Code analysis:
+{{code_analysis}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["code_analysis"]
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "test_suite"
+prompt_template = """
+Write a complete test suite in {{language}} covering:
+1. **Happy path tests** — one per public function
+2. **Edge case tests** — from the edge case list
+3. **Error handling tests** — each error path
+4. **Integration tests** — cross-component interactions
+
+Use descriptive test names following the pattern: `test_<function>_<scenario>_<expected_result>`.
+Include setup/teardown where needed. Add a comment explaining the intent of non-obvious tests.
+
+Code:
+{{code}}
+
+Edge cases:
+{{edge_cases}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["code_analysis", "edge_cases"]

workflows/translate-polish.toml

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 id = "translate-polish"
 name = "Translation & Polish"
-description = "Auto-detect language, translate, and review for naturalness"
+description = "Translate text into a target language, then review for accuracy, naturalness, and cultural fit."
 category = "language"
-tags = ["translation", "language", "localization"]
+tags = ["translation", "language", "localization", "writing"]
 
 [i18n.zh]
 name = "翻译与润色"
-description = "自动检测语言，翻译文本，并审校译文的自然度"
+description = "将文本翻译为目标语言，再审校准确性、自然度和文化适配性。"
 
 [[parameters]]
 name = "source_text"
@@ -14,11 +14,68 @@ description = "The text to translate"
 param_type = "string"
 required = true
 
-[[steps]]
-name = "translator"
-prompt_template = "You are an expert translator. Translate the following text. Auto-detect the source language: if it's Chinese, translate to English; if it's English, translate to Chinese; for other languages, translate to both Chinese and English. Preserve the original tone, style, and formatting.\n\nText:\n{{source_text}}"
+[[parameters]]
+name = "target_language"
+description = "Target language (e.g. English, Chinese, Spanish, Japanese, French)"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = "auto: if Chinese → English, if English → Chinese, otherwise → English"
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "register"
+description = "Desired register: formal, casual, technical, literary"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = "match source"
 
 [[steps]]
-name = "reviewer"
-prompt_template = "You are a bilingual language expert. Review the following translation for accuracy and naturalness. Check for: 1) Mistranslations or meaning shifts 2) Awkward phrasing that sounds translated 3) Cultural context issues. Output the improved final translation only.\n\nTranslation to review:\n{{translator}}"
-depends_on = ["translator"]
+name = "translate"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a professional translator. Translate the following text into {{target_language}}.
+
+Guidelines:
+- Preserve the original meaning, tone, and structure as closely as the target language allows
+- Use {{register}} register
+- For idiomatic expressions, translate the meaning rather than word-for-word
+- For proper nouns and technical terms, keep the original with a parenthetical explanation on first use if needed
+- If any passage is ambiguous in the source, note the ambiguity briefly after the translation
+
+Source text:
+{{source_text}}
+"""
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "back_translate"
+prompt_template = """
+Back-translate the following {{target_language}} translation into the source language. Do not look at the original — produce an independent translation from the target language only.
+
+This is used to verify accuracy by comparing the back-translation to the original.
+
+Translation to back-translate:
+{{translate}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["translate"]
+
+[[steps]]
+name = "review_and_polish"
+prompt_template = """
+You are a bilingual editor. Review the translation quality by comparing original, translation, and back-translation.
+
+Check for:
+1. Meaning shifts — where the back-translation diverges from the original
+2. Unnatural phrasing that sounds translated rather than native
+3. Register consistency (target: {{register}})
+4. Cultural appropriateness for {{target_language}} readers
+
+Output: the polished final translation only, with a brief note on any changes made.
+
+Original:
+{{source_text}}
+
+Translation:
+{{translate}}
+
+Back-translation:
+{{back_translate}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["translate", "back_translate"]

workflows/weekly-report.toml

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 id = "weekly-report"
 name = "Weekly Report Generator"
-description = "Organize raw work notes into a polished weekly report"
-category = "business"
-tags = ["report", "weekly", "productivity"]
+description = "Turn raw work notes into a polished weekly report with highlights, metrics, blockers, and next week's priorities."
+category = "productivity"
+tags = ["report", "weekly", "productivity", "management"]
 
 [i18n.zh]
 name = "周报生成器"
-description = "将零散的工作笔记整理为一份精炼的周报"
+description = "将零散工作笔记整理为规范周报，包含亮点、指标、阻塞项和下周计划。"
 
 [[parameters]]
 name = "work_notes"
@@ -14,11 +14,64 @@ description = "Raw work notes, bullet points, or activity log for the week"
 param_type = "string"
 required = true
 
+[[parameters]]
+name = "team_or_role"
+description = "Your team name or role (used to frame context appropriately)"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = ""
+
+[[parameters]]
+name = "audience"
+description = "Who will read this report (manager, team, executive)"
+param_type = "string"
+required = false
+default = "manager"
+
 [[steps]]
-name = "organizer"
-prompt_template = "You are an executive assistant. Organize the following raw work notes into structured categories: 1) Completed tasks 2) In-progress items 3) Blockers/Issues 4) Key decisions made. Extract and list each item clearly, even if the notes are messy.\n\nRaw notes:\n{{work_notes}}"
+name = "extract"
+prompt_template = """
+You are an executive assistant. Parse the following raw work notes and extract every item into structured categories:
+
+**Completed** — fully done tasks (include measurable outcomes if mentioned)
+**In Progress** — work started but not finished (include % complete or next milestone if available)
+**Blockers** — anything preventing progress, and who or what is blocking
+**Decisions Made** — choices or agreements reached this week
+**Metrics** — any numbers mentioned (velocity, usage, revenue, bugs closed, etc.)
+**Upcoming** — planned work mentioned for next week
+
+Do not summarise or rephrase — extract faithfully.
+
+Team/Role: {{team_or_role}}
+
+Raw notes:
+{{work_notes}}
+"""
 
 [[steps]]
 name = "report_writer"
-prompt_template = "You are a professional report writer. Transform the organized items below into a polished weekly report with these sections:\n\n## This Week's Highlights\n(top 3 achievements)\n\n## Progress Details\n(organized by project/area)\n\n## Challenges & Solutions\n(any blockers and how they were addressed)\n\n## Next Week's Priorities\n(based on in-progress items)\n\nKeep it concise and professional.\n\nOrganized items:\n{{organizer}}"
-depends_on = ["organizer"]
+prompt_template = """
+Write a polished weekly report for a {{audience}} audience. Tone should be professional and concise — no padding.
+
+## Highlights
+Top 3 achievements this week, each in one sentence with measurable impact where available.
+
+## Progress
+Grouped by project or workstream. For each: what was done, current status, and any dependency.
+
+## Metrics
+Key numbers from the week. If none were provided, omit this section.
+
+## Blockers & Risks
+Each blocker: description, impact, owner, and requested action.
+
+## Next Week
+Top 3-5 priorities with owner and expected outcome.
+
+## Notes
+Decisions made, process changes, or anything the audience should be aware of.
+
+Extracted data:
+{{extract}}
+"""
+depends_on = ["extract"]