Evan
05bdf02169
* feat(workflows): add 13 workflow templates across engineering, business, and productivity Engineering: - bug-triage: reproduce path → root cause → fix plan - api-design: resource model → endpoints → OpenAPI spec - incident-postmortem: timeline → RCA → full postmortem report - test-generation: code analysis → edge cases → full test suite - refactor-plan: smell analysis → prioritised opportunities → migration plan Business: - competitor-analysis: profiles → SWOT → strategy report - product-spec: problem definition → user stories → full PRD - market-research: landscape → segments → research report Productivity/Thinking: - meeting-summary: raw notes → structured summary → follow-up email - decision-matrix: criteria → weighted scoring → recommendation memo - learning-plan: gap analysis → roadmap → week-1 day-by-day plan - job-application: job analysis → tailored resume → cover letter → interview prep - blog-post: research → outline → draft → SEO optimisation Closes #1912 on librefang/librefang * fix(workflows): overhaul existing 9 templates - data-pipeline: redesigned — original 'extract from URL' step was broken (LLMs cannot fetch URLs); replaced with paste-data approach (profile → clean_transform → analyse) with analysis_goal parameter - translate-polish: added target_language and register parameters; added back-translation step for accuracy verification - weekly-report: added team/audience parameters, richer extraction step, added Metrics and Notes sections - content-pipeline: added audience/tone parameters, added outline step between research and writing - content-review: fix category 'content' → 'creation' - customer-support: fix category 'support' → 'business' * style(workflows): convert all prompt_template strings to TOML multiline syntax Replace \n escape sequences with real newlines using triple-quote multiline strings ("""...""") across all 22 workflow templates. No content changes — formatting only. * style(hands): replace \n escape in reddit writer format example with multiline code block
79 lines
2.5 KiB
TOML
79 lines
2.5 KiB
TOML
id = "research"
|
|
name = "Research & Summarise"
|
|
description = "Research pipeline that investigates a topic from multiple angles, cross-checks findings for accuracy, and produces a concise executive summary with citations."
|
|
category = "research"
|
|
tags = ["research", "fact-check", "summarise", "analysis"]
|
|
|
|
[i18n.zh]
|
|
name = "调研与摘要"
|
|
description = "调研流水线，从多个角度研究主题，交叉验证结果的准确性，并生成带引用的精炼摘要。"
|
|
|
|
[[parameters]]
|
|
name = "topic"
|
|
description = "The research topic or question to investigate"
|
|
param_type = "string"
|
|
required = true
|
|
|
|
[[parameters]]
|
|
name = "depth"
|
|
description = "Research depth: overview, standard, or deep-dive"
|
|
param_type = "string"
|
|
required = false
|
|
default = "standard"
|
|
|
|
[[parameters]]
|
|
name = "audience"
|
|
description = "Target audience for the summary (executive, technical, general)"
|
|
param_type = "string"
|
|
required = false
|
|
default = "general"
|
|
|
|
[[steps]]
|
|
name = "research_primary"
|
|
prompt_template = """
|
|
Conduct {{depth}}-level research on the following topic. Identify key facts, major viewpoints, recent developments, and relevant data points. Organise findings into clear sections with source attribution where possible.
|
|
|
|
Topic: {{topic}}
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
[[steps]]
|
|
name = "research_counter"
|
|
prompt_template = """
|
|
Investigate counter-arguments, alternative perspectives, and potential criticisms related to the following topic. Identify areas of genuine controversy or debate, and note any commonly cited claims that are misleading or outdated.
|
|
|
|
Topic: {{topic}}
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
[[steps]]
|
|
name = "fact_check"
|
|
prompt_template = """
|
|
Cross-check the following research findings for factual accuracy. For each major claim, assess confidence level (confirmed, likely, uncertain, disputed). Flag any contradictions between the primary research and counter-arguments. Note any claims that require additional verification.
|
|
|
|
Primary research:
|
|
{{research_primary}}
|
|
|
|
Counter-arguments:
|
|
{{research_counter}}
|
|
"""
|
|
depends_on = ["research_primary", "research_counter"]
|
|
|
|
[[steps]]
|
|
name = "summarise"
|
|
prompt_template = """
|
|
Produce a concise executive summary suitable for a {{audience}} audience. Incorporate verified findings from the fact-check step. Structure as:
|
|
1. Key takeaways (3-5 bullet points)
|
|
2. Detailed analysis with confidence levels
|
|
3. Areas of uncertainty or debate
|
|
4. Recommendations for further investigation
|
|
|
|
Fact-checked research:
|
|
{{fact_check}}
|
|
|
|
Primary findings:
|
|
{{research_primary}}
|
|
|
|
Alternative perspectives:
|
|
{{research_counter}}
|
|
"""
|
|
depends_on = ["fact_check"]
|