Initial Arka plugin registry: Official plugins mirror + Arka-signed index

11 plugins from github.com/librefang/librefang-registry plugins/.
index.json / index.json.sig are signed with Arka's Ed25519 key
(not upstream stats.librefang.ai). Private key is not in this repo.

plugins/sentiment-tracker/hooks/ingest.py

@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""Sentiment tracker ingest hook.
+
+Analyzes user message sentiment using keyword-based scoring and injects
+emotional context so agents can respond with appropriate tone.
+
+Receives via stdin:
+    {"type": "ingest", "agent_id": "...", "message": "user message text"}
+
+Prints to stdout:
+    {"type": "ingest_result", "memories": [{"content": "..."}]}
+"""
+import json
+import re
+import sys
+
+# Positive sentiment words with base score of +1
+POSITIVE_WORDS = frozenset({
+    "great", "love", "excellent", "happy", "thanks", "awesome", "perfect",
+    "wonderful", "good", "nice", "amazing", "fantastic", "helpful", "pleased",
+    "appreciate", "brilliant", "outstanding", "superb", "delightful", "glad",
+    "impressive", "beautiful", "enjoy", "excited", "grateful", "incredible",
+    "marvelous", "terrific", "thank", "cool",
+})
+
+# Negative sentiment words with base score of -1
+NEGATIVE_WORDS = frozenset({
+    "bad", "terrible", "hate", "angry", "frustrated", "disappointed", "broken",
+    "wrong", "awful", "horrible", "annoying", "useless", "fail", "worst",
+    "problem", "issue", "bug", "error", "crash", "slow", "stuck", "confused",
+    "difficult", "painful", "ugly", "ridiculous", "poor", "sucks", "garbage",
+    "missing",
+})
+
+# Intensifiers multiply the next sentiment word's score by this factor
+INTENSIFIERS = frozenset({
+    "very", "extremely", "really", "absolutely", "totally", "incredibly",
+    "completely", "utterly", "highly", "so",
+})
+INTENSIFIER_MULTIPLIER = 1.5
+
+# Negators flip the polarity of the next sentiment word
+NEGATORS = frozenset({
+    "not", "no", "never", "don't", "doesn't", "isn't", "can't", "won't",
+    "didn't", "wasn't", "weren't", "couldn't", "shouldn't", "wouldn't",
+    "hardly", "barely", "neither",
+})
+
+# Sentiment thresholds
+POSITIVE_THRESHOLD = 0.3
+NEGATIVE_THRESHOLD = -0.3
+
+
+def tokenize(text):
+    """Split text into lowercase tokens, preserving contractions."""
+    return re.findall(r"[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z']*", text.lower())
+
+
+def compute_sentiment(tokens):
+    """Compute sentiment score from -1.0 to 1.0.
+
+    Walks through tokens tracking negator and intensifier state,
+    then applies them to sentiment-bearing words.
+    """
+    if not tokens:
+        return 0.0
+
+    raw_score = 0.0
+    negate_next = False
+    intensify_next = False
+
+    for token in tokens:
+        if token in NEGATORS:
+            negate_next = True
+            continue
+
+        if token in INTENSIFIERS:
+            intensify_next = True
+            continue
+
+        score = 0.0
+        if token in POSITIVE_WORDS:
+            score = 1.0
+        elif token in NEGATIVE_WORDS:
+            score = -1.0
+
+        if score != 0.0:
+            if intensify_next:
+                score *= INTENSIFIER_MULTIPLIER
+                intensify_next = False
+
+            if negate_next:
+                score *= -1.0
+                negate_next = False
+
+            raw_score += score
+        else:
+            # Reset modifiers if the next word is not a sentiment word
+            # (modifiers only apply to the immediately following sentiment word)
+            negate_next = False
+            intensify_next = False
+
+    # Normalize to -1.0 .. 1.0 using tanh-like scaling
+    # This keeps small scores proportional while bounding large ones
+    word_count = len(tokens)
+    if word_count == 0:
+        return 0.0
+
+    # Scale by number of tokens to normalize for message length
+    normalized = raw_score / max(word_count ** 0.5, 1.0)
+
+    # Clamp to [-1.0, 1.0]
+    return max(-1.0, min(1.0, normalized))
+
+
+def classify(score):
+    """Classify sentiment score into a label."""
+    if score > POSITIVE_THRESHOLD:
+        return "positive"
+    elif score < NEGATIVE_THRESHOLD:
+        return "negative"
+    else:
+        return "neutral"
+
+
+def main():
+    request = json.loads(sys.stdin.read())
+    message = request.get("message", "")
+
+    if not message.strip():
+        print(json.dumps({"type": "ingest_result", "memories": []}))
+        return
+
+    tokens = tokenize(message)
+    score = compute_sentiment(tokens)
+    label = classify(score)
+
+    # Only inject memory for clearly non-neutral sentiment
+    if label == "neutral":
+        print(json.dumps({"type": "ingest_result", "memories": []}))
+        return
+
+    score_str = f"{score:.1f}"
+
+    if label == "negative":
+        content = f"[sentiment] User appears frustrated (score: {score_str}). Consider acknowledging the issue."
+    else:
+        content = f"[sentiment] User seems satisfied (score: {score_str}). Positive interaction."
+
+    memories = [{"content": content}]
+    print(json.dumps({"type": "ingest_result", "memories": memories}))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    main()