Evan
6e48be1e31
9 bundled workflow templates: - data-pipeline: ETL extract/transform/validate - content-review: multi-agent draft/quality/accuracy/edit - customer-support: tiered triage/response/escalation - code-review: parallel correctness+security+style analysis - research: research/fact-check/summarize - content-pipeline: research → write → edit article creation - translate-polish: auto-detect language, translate, review - brainstorm: ideation → evaluation → action plan - weekly-report: raw notes → organized → polished report
44 lines
2.3 KiB
TOML
44 lines
2.3 KiB
TOML
id = "research"
|
|
name = "Research & Summarise"
|
|
description = "Research pipeline that investigates a topic from multiple angles, cross-checks findings for accuracy, and produces a concise executive summary with citations."
|
|
category = "research"
|
|
tags = ["research", "fact-check", "summarise", "analysis"]
|
|
|
|
[[parameters]]
|
|
name = "topic"
|
|
description = "The research topic or question to investigate"
|
|
param_type = "string"
|
|
required = true
|
|
|
|
[[parameters]]
|
|
name = "depth"
|
|
description = "Research depth: overview, standard, or deep-dive"
|
|
param_type = "string"
|
|
required = false
|
|
default = "standard"
|
|
|
|
[[parameters]]
|
|
name = "audience"
|
|
description = "Target audience for the summary (executive, technical, general)"
|
|
param_type = "string"
|
|
required = false
|
|
default = "general"
|
|
|
|
[[steps]]
|
|
name = "research_primary"
|
|
prompt_template = "Conduct {{depth}}-level research on the following topic. Identify key facts, major viewpoints, recent developments, and relevant data points. Organise findings into clear sections with source attribution where possible.\n\nTopic: {{topic}}"
|
|
|
|
[[steps]]
|
|
name = "research_counter"
|
|
prompt_template = "Investigate counter-arguments, alternative perspectives, and potential criticisms related to the following topic. Identify areas of genuine controversy or debate, and note any commonly cited claims that are misleading or outdated.\n\nTopic: {{topic}}"
|
|
|
|
[[steps]]
|
|
name = "fact_check"
|
|
prompt_template = "Cross-check the following research findings for factual accuracy. For each major claim, assess confidence level (confirmed, likely, uncertain, disputed). Flag any contradictions between the primary research and counter-arguments. Note any claims that require additional verification.\n\nPrimary research:\n{{research_primary}}\n\nCounter-arguments:\n{{research_counter}}"
|
|
depends_on = ["research_primary", "research_counter"]
|
|
|
|
[[steps]]
|
|
name = "summarise"
|
|
prompt_template = "Produce a concise executive summary suitable for a {{audience}} audience. Incorporate verified findings from the fact-check step. Structure as:\n1. Key takeaways (3-5 bullet points)\n2. Detailed analysis with confidence levels\n3. Areas of uncertainty or debate\n4. Recommendations for further investigation\n\nFact-checked research:\n{{fact_check}}\n\nPrimary findings:\n{{research_primary}}\n\nAlternative perspectives:\n{{research_counter}}"
|
|
depends_on = ["fact_check"]
|