--- name: wiki-analyst version: "1.0.0" description: Wiki Analyst skills — synthesis methodology, gap identification, contradiction handling, and query resolution. author: Leszek3737 tags: [wiki, knowledge-base, analyst, synthesis, reasoning] runtime: prompt_only --- # Wiki Hand — SKILL-analyst.md ## 1. Obsidian Conventions ### Wikilinks - Internal cross-references: `[[page-name]]` (no path, no extension) - Display text override: `[[page-name|Display Text]]` - Never use markdown `[text](path)` for internal links - External URLs: standard markdown `[text](https://...)` - Image embeds: `![[filename.png]]` - Images live in `raw/assets/` ### File Naming - Format: `kebab-case.md` - Max 40 characters (excluding `.md`) - ASCII only — transliterate non-ASCII characters (ü → ue, ñ → n, ś → s, etc.) - Entities: canonical name (`john-doe.md`, not `dr-john-doe-phd.md`) - Concepts: noun phrase (`knowledge-base.md`, not `about-knowledge-bases.md`) - Sources: derived from title (`the-future-of-ai.md`) - Syntheses: derived from query (`tradeoffs-x-vs-y.md`) - No version suffixes (_v2, _revised, _updated) ### Frontmatter - Valid YAML between `---` delimiters at the top of every page - All fields lowercase with underscores - Dates: ISO 8601 (`YYYY-MM-DD`) - Lists: YAML sequences (not comma-separated strings) - Dataview-compatible: all fields are queryable ### Dataview Compatibility Useful queries the user can run in Obsidian: ```dataview TABLE confidence, source_count, last_updated FROM "pages/entities" SORT source_count DESC ``` ```dataview LIST FROM "pages/concepts" WHERE confidence = "disputed" ``` ```dataview TABLE claim_count, date_ingested FROM "pages/sources" SORT date_ingested DESC ``` --- ## 4. Provenance and Confidence ### Inline Provenance Syntax Every key claim (bullet point in Key Claims, Key Points, Key Facts sections) requires a provenance tag at the end of the line: ```markdown - The company reported $10M ARR in Q4 2025 ([[annual-report-2025]], extracted) - This suggests a 40% year-over-year growth rate (inferred) - However, a later filing revised this to $8.5M ([[sec-filing-q1-2026]], extracted) - The actual growth rate remains disputed ([[annual-report-2025]], [[sec-filing-q1-2026]], disputed) ``` | Tag | Meaning | When to use | |-----|---------|-------------| | `([[source]], extracted)` | Directly stated in the source | Verbatim facts, statistics, dates, names | | `([[source-a]], [[source-b]], extracted)` | Corroborated across sources | Same fact confirmed independently | | `(inferred)` | Derived by the LLM | Connections, implications, patterns not explicitly stated | | `([[source-a]], [[source-b]], disputed)` | Sources contradict | Present both claims, let the user judge | ### Page-Level Confidence Set in frontmatter `confidence` field: | Level | Rule | |-------|------| | `high` | All key claims are `extracted` from 2+ corroborating sources | | `medium` | Mix of extracted and inferred, OR all extracted from a single source | | `low` | Primarily inferred, OR based on one unverified source | | `disputed` | Contains at least one claim tagged `disputed` | **Propagation in syntheses:** A synthesis page's confidence = the MINIMUM confidence of its consulted pages. If any consulted page is `disputed`, the synthesis must flag this. ### Confidence Update Triggers - New source corroborates an existing claim → consider upgrading to `high` - New source contradicts an existing claim → downgrade to `disputed` - Source retracted or superseded → re-assess claims dependent on it --- ## 7. Synthesis Methodology ### Combining Multiple Sources 1. **Identify overlapping claims** — same fact from different sources 2. **Note corroboration** — claims supported by 2+ sources get higher confidence 3. **Surface contradictions** — present both sides with citations, do not silently pick one 4. **Fill complementary gaps** — where sources complement each other, weave together 5. **Maintain provenance chain** — every claim in the synthesis traces back to source pages ### Handling Contradictions ```markdown ## 2. Page Templates ## 12. Worked Examples